Eminent Domain Abuse in Norwood, Ohio

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

This story illustrates the problem with Eminent Domain. When it is a school or park that the community needs, eminent domain is a great tool. When it is a development to enrich either the government or a business, eminent domain will always be abused. Joe Horney wanted to keep his house. A developer wants to buy it at market rate, but at a predefined market rate that the sheriff is enforcing.

Part of the game of land ownership and development is that the last person to sell out tends to do better financially. The developer has to put together the properties and make an offer that entices the people to sell. Joe Horney should be able keep his house or get an offer he can not refuse, and I am not talking about a sheriff coming to the door, but a ridiculous dollar amount. That is the bet the developer is placing that he can put together all of the properties to use for the project. Instead, he starts out threatening the people of the community with eminent domain changing the dynamic of the marketplace. And that is wrong.

Joe Horney used a small inheritance from his grandparents to make a down payment on a $63,900 house in 1991. He lived in the house for a while, fixed it up and rented it out for 10 years. He went on to manage construction of luxury homes and own other rental properties.

Then came Sept. 28, 2002. In a penthouse office overlooking Horney’s rental property, a developer told local residents that he wanted to buy all the homes on the block, tear them down and build condos, retail shops and parking garages.

A PowerPoint presentation made clear what would happen to those who refused to sell: eminent domain. The city of Norwood would use its governmental power to transfer ownership of the property from uncooperative owners to the developer.

Horney, 36, got angry and left the meeting. “From that moment on, my mind was made up,” he says. “They can’t take my property just because they want to. That’s not right.” via USATODAY.com

Related posts:
  1. Chicago and Cook County Sheriff Will Not Enforce Foreclosures
  2. Using Real Estate Auctions To Determine Value In Soft Market
  3. Ford Foundations Creates New 50 Million Dollar Forclosure Fund
  4. Cheaper To Tear Down New Homes Than Sell Them
  5. Contractor Builds Million Dollar Business Card

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • My Representative is one of the infamous eight Republicans who voted to support this disgraceful legislation, Frank LoBiondo in South ...
      Susan | 3Jul09 | More
    • When selling our homes, what takes place should be between the seller and the buyer. Not the government. ...
      sam | 3Jul09 | More
    • Yea I guess I would be mad or should I say disappointed if I missed the cut off date for ...
      Lauren | 3Jul09 | More
    • If you haven't read this bill I could easily see how one could support it. I mean the bill ...
      Corey K | 3Jul09 | More
    • Pain is gain. I really support this, and the change may be hard but it has to be done. ...
      M Realty | 3Jul09 | More
    • I can't tell you how many people I've talked to in the past week who are completely unaware that the ...
      Trish | 3Jul09 | More
    • The liberal government policies have facilitated the expansion of the foreign involvement in the Real Estate Investment sector.
      genetic cancer testing | 3Jul09 | More
    • We all know EPA has the most murders per 100k ever. 175 murders per 100k.
      hmmm | 3Jul09 | More
    • I am confused...I closed on my house 1 April 2008, I did not get $7500 pay back or $8000 no ...
      Jeff Hammack | 2Jul09 | More
    • I am a person that has been qualified for a loan and really would love to see this enacted. ...
      Gretchen | 2Jul09 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Recent Friends Visiting

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner