New Jersey Sex Offender Residency Laws Create Conundrum For Landlords and Sellers

New  Jersey allows its towns and cities to create sex offender free zones typically around schools and parks. That is all well and good, but Freehold Township created a regulation that expects the sellers or homeowners to do a background check to determine if the buyer is a sex offender. However, the sex offender registry states in its terms of use it is illegal to use the sexual offenders site to deny housing.

So what is the landlord or seller to do? Break the state law, or break the local ordinance. Both sides are trying to do the right thing, but ill thought out legislation puts a burden on the property owner.

Fortunately, the Freehold Township committee is revisiting the regulations.

Like at least 45 other municipalities in Monmouth and Ocean counties, the township limits the areas where registered sex offenders can live. But unlike similar ordinances, the township’s rules outlined, at least in part, how officials planned to make sure their sex-offender-free zones were enforced.
They decided to require sellers or landlords of homes near places such as parks and schools to make sure a new home buyer or tenant was not listed on the state’s sex offender Web site.
It was that part of the ordinance that concerned Grasso, who learned about the local rule after inquiries from the “Asbury Park Press.” He wrote to officials here, who then agreed to hold off on requiring that Internet check, while they drafted a new set of guidelines. via CourierPostOnline

Related posts:
  1. Real Estate Man Is LandlordFor Sex Offenders In Florida
  2. New Jersey Loses One Third of Real Estate Agents In 2008
  3. Zoning Laws Run Amok – Home Bible Study Banned Without Permit in San Diego
  4. Landlords Better Get Ready For A New Accounting Headache With New Tax Plan

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. [...] (Read the rest at The Real Estate Bloggers) [...]

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • Great points Tom - the flavor of the day solution is only adding to the instability and volatility. When Washington ...
      Taylor Anderson | 8Feb10 | More
    • I see it all too often where owners decide to be investors without understanding that tenants have rights. Its ...
      Doreen Zelma | 7Feb10 | More
    • cont from above post..... please contact me via e-mail if interested in the home listed above. jonieckstrom@yahoo.com
      Joni Reese | 7Feb10 | More
    • Our home is in Vancouver Washington. Nice, quiet neighborhood, wide treeline streets, large evergreens, green everywhere, ( it's the northwest ...
      Joni Reese | 7Feb10 | More
    • This is a topic currently being debated in our local Real Estate Board here in Toronto Canada. Online, we ...
      Mississauga Condos | 7Feb10 | More
    • A property management company should realize that most potential tenants now will have a foreclosure or bankruptcy on their credit....as ...
      Foreclosures | 6Feb10 | More
    • my boyfriend and i just fell for the scam ourselves, it's sad what they are able to do. I am ...
      megan | 5Feb10 | More
    • Now is an excellent time for business people to buy if they have decent credit (I did not say excellent ...
      Braudis Pegram | 4Feb10 | More
    • Tom is correct and @Al, there's a great deal of logic in your response; however, although I'm not an activist ...
      Braudis Pegram | 4Feb10 | More
    • I just finished emailing some guy from "West Africa" who gave me the same exact bs. He even went so ...
      Shawn | 4Feb10 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner