New Jersey Sex Offender Residency Laws Create Conundrum For Landlords and Sellers

New  Jersey allows its towns and cities to create sex offender free zones typically around schools and parks. That is all well and good, but Freehold Township created a regulation that expects the sellers or homeowners to do a background check to determine if the buyer is a sex offender. However, the sex offender registry states in its terms of use it is illegal to use the sexual offenders site to deny housing.

So what is the landlord or seller to do? Break the state law, or break the local ordinance. Both sides are trying to do the right thing, but ill thought out legislation puts a burden on the property owner.

Fortunately, the Freehold Township committee is revisiting the regulations.

Like at least 45 other municipalities in Monmouth and Ocean counties, the township limits the areas where registered sex offenders can live. But unlike similar ordinances, the township’s rules outlined, at least in part, how officials planned to make sure their sex-offender-free zones were enforced.
They decided to require sellers or landlords of homes near places such as parks and schools to make sure a new home buyer or tenant was not listed on the state’s sex offender Web site.
It was that part of the ordinance that concerned Grasso, who learned about the local rule after inquiries from the “Asbury Park Press.” He wrote to officials here, who then agreed to hold off on requiring that Internet check, while they drafted a new set of guidelines. via CourierPostOnline

Related posts:
  1. Sellers Letters To Buyers, Why We Loved This Home
  2. Why Range Pricing Of Homes Is A Suckers Bet For Sellers
  3. New Jersey Loses One Third of Real Estate Agents In 2008
  4. Mortgage Rate Drop is Not Expected To Create Huge Demand
  5. Are Sellers Finally Understanding What It Takes To Sell A Home in 2009

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. [...] (Read the rest at The Real Estate Bloggers) [...]

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • My Representative is one of the infamous eight Republicans who voted to support this disgraceful legislation, Frank LoBiondo in South ...
      Susan | 3Jul09 | More
    • When selling our homes, what takes place should be between the seller and the buyer. Not the government. ...
      sam | 3Jul09 | More
    • Yea I guess I would be mad or should I say disappointed if I missed the cut off date for ...
      Lauren | 3Jul09 | More
    • If you haven't read this bill I could easily see how one could support it. I mean the bill ...
      Corey K | 3Jul09 | More
    • Pain is gain. I really support this, and the change may be hard but it has to be done. ...
      M Realty | 3Jul09 | More
    • I can't tell you how many people I've talked to in the past week who are completely unaware that the ...
      Trish | 3Jul09 | More
    • The liberal government policies have facilitated the expansion of the foreign involvement in the Real Estate Investment sector.
      genetic cancer testing | 3Jul09 | More
    • We all know EPA has the most murders per 100k ever. 175 murders per 100k.
      hmmm | 3Jul09 | More
    • I am confused...I closed on my house 1 April 2008, I did not get $7500 pay back or $8000 no ...
      Jeff Hammack | 2Jul09 | More
    • I am a person that has been qualified for a loan and really would love to see this enacted. ...
      Gretchen | 2Jul09 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Recent Friends Visiting

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner