<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housing Sales Rise Significantly In February 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2006/03/23/housing-sales-rise-significantly-in-february-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2006/03/23/housing-sales-rise-significantly-in-february-2006/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Blog, Mortgage, and Development News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert CotÃ©</title>
		<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2006/03/23/housing-sales-rise-significantly-in-february-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert CotÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therealestatebloggers.com/2006/03/23/housing-sales-rise-significantly-in-february-2006/#comment-765</guid>
		<description>What?  No correction?  Sales in Feb did not rise 5.2% as you report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?  No correction?  Sales in Feb did not rise 5.2% as you report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert CotÃ©</title>
		<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2006/03/23/housing-sales-rise-significantly-in-february-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert CotÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therealestatebloggers.com/2006/03/23/housing-sales-rise-significantly-in-february-2006/#comment-746</guid>
		<description>The NAR lies, you repeat the lie.  There&#039;s no fixing the NAR but you should at least check your sources before adding your own spin.  

FEB 2005 402,000 sales
FEB 2006 401,000 sales (preliminary)

&quot;Seasonally adjust&quot; that.  I guess Feb is a different &quot;season&quot; in alternate years.  

You want to &quot;adjust?&quot; Fine, better include supply adjustments. Something like 1.3 million units added last year so just to keep the sales rate steady we&#039;d need to see 1.8% y-o-y increases in the raw data.  

If I sound angry it is because I am.  The &quot;news&quot; moved markets.  People were hurt.  I obviously don&#039;t trust the NAR but I&#039;d like to think that therealestatebloggers has enough self respect to at least verify before parroting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NAR lies, you repeat the lie.  There&#8217;s no fixing the NAR but you should at least check your sources before adding your own spin.  </p>
<p>FEB 2005 402,000 sales<br />
FEB 2006 401,000 sales (preliminary)</p>
<p>&#8220;Seasonally adjust&#8221; that.  I guess Feb is a different &#8220;season&#8221; in alternate years.  </p>
<p>You want to &#8220;adjust?&#8221; Fine, better include supply adjustments. Something like 1.3 million units added last year so just to keep the sales rate steady we&#8217;d need to see 1.8% y-o-y increases in the raw data.  </p>
<p>If I sound angry it is because I am.  The &#8220;news&#8221; moved markets.  People were hurt.  I obviously don&#8217;t trust the NAR but I&#8217;d like to think that therealestatebloggers has enough self respect to at least verify before parroting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
