US Senate Sits On Eminent Domain Legislation - Property Rights Groups React

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

As we have discussed many times, the politicians in power will rarely give up power. This is evident in the eminent domain battle that is raging in the country. The House of Representatives passed legislation to withhold money to states that allow eminent domain abuses. These folks have to be elected every two years and know that eminent domain will be an issue in the midterm  elections.

The Senators are elected every 6 years. They do not have the imperative to move quickly on this as very few of them are succeptable to the electorate this period. So they are sitting on the legislation. And sitting. And sitting. And sitting.

Well, when you sit around you get a fat ass. And if Bill Frist wants to sit on this and he wants to be the President in 2008, he will have a fat tush to kick around in the primaries and general election. Billy, remember that people care about eminent domain. So if you want a chance to be President in 2008, get off your ass and get this on the floor for a vote!

The House of Representatives passed H.R. 4128, the “Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2005″ in early November by a vote of 376-38, but the measure has mired in the Senate Judiciary Committee without a scheduled vote. The legislation seeks to curb eminent domain abuse by withholding all federal economic development funds for two years from states and localities that use this right for private commercial development. The House passed the measure in response to the Kelo v. City of New London, CT court case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court last summer.
And the American public continues to fervently oppose this type of government takings. One national survey after another demonstrates a minimum of eighty-five percent of public support in reforming eminent domain abuse to protect homes, businesses and churches from government’s grasp.
“Americans remain vulnerable to government’s ability to snap up a family’s home or church today and turn it into a mansion tomorrow,” said Scott A. LaGanga, executive director of PRA. “As indicated by the organizations on this letter and countless public opinion polls, Senate action is vital to protect the future of private property in the United States.”  via Yahoo! News.

Related posts:
  1. Mortgages May Be Safe From Bankruptcy Judges
  2. Mortgage Bill Worries New HUD Secretary Steve Preston
  3. Local Municipalities Losing Millions in Property Tax Revenue
  4. Half Of Housing Grant Money Goes Towards Foreclosure Purchases
  5. Homeless Groups Organizing Squatters To Take Foreclosures

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • Wow, very sad; I didn't know the guy personally but he seemed like a nice guy. I still remember the ...
      Shelton | 4Jul09 | More
    • My Representative is one of the infamous eight Republicans who voted to support this disgraceful legislation, Frank LoBiondo in South ...
      Susan | 3Jul09 | More
    • When selling our homes, what takes place should be between the seller and the buyer. Not the government. ...
      sam | 3Jul09 | More
    • Yea I guess I would be mad or should I say disappointed if I missed the cut off date for ...
      Lauren | 3Jul09 | More
    • If you haven't read this bill I could easily see how one could support it. I mean the bill ...
      Corey K | 3Jul09 | More
    • Pain is gain. I really support this, and the change may be hard but it has to be done. ...
      M Realty | 3Jul09 | More
    • I can't tell you how many people I've talked to in the past week who are completely unaware that the ...
      Trish | 3Jul09 | More
    • The liberal government policies have facilitated the expansion of the foreign involvement in the Real Estate Investment sector.
      genetic cancer testing | 3Jul09 | More
    • We all know EPA has the most murders per 100k ever. 175 murders per 100k.
      hmmm | 3Jul09 | More
    • I am confused...I closed on my house 1 April 2008, I did not get $7500 pay back or $8000 no ...
      Jeff Hammack | 2Jul09 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Recent Friends Visiting

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner