Ohio Supreme Court Stops Worst of Eminent Domain Abuse

Ohio has long been seen as one of the worst abusers of eminent domain in the country. The combination of a slow economy (lower taxes), older infrastructure, and local Democratic Party machines has created an environment where personal property rights have been trampled to improve the tax base.

And parts of me can see the reasoning. Some of the prospects for the smaller Ohio cities are bleak. However, taking a mans property by the government is so much more wrong. That these local governments never see this is frightening and I am very pleased with the ruling today by the Ohio Supreme Court. Their recognition of the rights that the Federal Supreme Court could not see is inspiring and we owe them a debt of gratitude.

In a unanimous and lengthy decision, the Court laid out a series of important legal opinions.  The Ohio Supreme Court explicitly rejected the U.S. Supreme Court’s infamous Kelo decision of June 2005, in which that Court held that local governments can take property from one person and transfer it to another because the new owner might produce more taxes or more jobs than the current one-so-called “economic development.”  Second, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that state courts must apply “heightened scrutiny” to uses of eminent domain, especially when the property is being taken for use by another private party; according to the Court, lower Ohio courts should not simply rubber-stamp decisions by local government to take property.  Next, the Court held that statutes authorizing the taking of property cannot be vague.  The “deteriorating” standard used by Norwood “is a standardless standard,” and the Court rejected it.  Finally, the Court struck down Ohio’s statute that allowed property to be taken even before an appeals court ruled that the taking was legal.

Thank you Ohio for setting such a strong standard.

Related posts:
  1. South Carolina Blocks Foreclosures Until Housing Plan Enacted
  2. Local Municipalities Losing Millions in Property Tax Revenue
  3. Illegal Housing Crackdown in Quincy Massachusetts Yielding Positive Results
  4. Digital Assets For Real Estate Professionals

« « Redfin Appearing Before Congressional Panel| Even Real Estate Agents Are Not Immune From Real”ity” TV » »

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • I need the picture of beautiful small house in asia/gulf style like pakistan india.bagladesh and u.a.e please provide me the best ...
      MUHAMMAD TAHIR | 17Mar10 | More
    • It's been a long that I have not visited your blog and I think I am not up to date. ...
      homes for sale in casa grande az | 16Mar10 | More
    • I like how the market is described here. It really does make sense that if we can stabilize the housing ...
      Fort Collins CO Homes | 16Mar10 | More
    • The problem is our government, followed by the banks. We bailed them out when they were in trouble, but now ...
      Thom Abbott | 16Mar10 | More
    • I would appreciate if you would forward information on whether land contracts qualify for the tax credit. Thanks,
      Rebecca LaTocha | 16Mar10 | More
    • I have lived in Texas all my life, and I'm surprised that Texas as well as Oklahoma and Kansas are ...
      Texas Real Estate Magazine | 16Mar10 | More
    • I think $1 home is a toy. I don't even imagine to have a house which is worth $1.
      homes for sale in casa grande az | 16Mar10 | More
    • Yo u guys don't no wat ur talkin bout Florida had most crime fade county little haiti opa locka west ...
      John | 16Mar10 | More
    • I don't recommend CL in most cases...I use it for hiring, finding baby stuff, computers and bikes...anything else is a ...
      Aaron Knutson | 16Mar10 | More
    • I bought a statue tonight to bury in my yard for a quick sale on my house. I already found ...
      Connie | 16Mar10 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner