<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Real Estate Appreciated 11% A Year Over Long Term</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Blog, Mortgage, and Development News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/comment-page-1/#comment-169127</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/#comment-169127</guid>
		<description>Data can certainly be misleading at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data can certainly be misleading at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mea Culpa: Canadian Housing Did Not Grow 11 Percent, Instead 5.3 Percent &#8212; The Real Estate Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/comment-page-1/#comment-50272</link>
		<dc:creator>Mea Culpa: Canadian Housing Did Not Grow 11 Percent, Instead 5.3 Percent &#8212; The Real Estate Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/#comment-50272</guid>
		<description>[...] week I reported a story out of the Ottawa Citizen that housing in the country had risen over 25 years by 11 percent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I reported a story out of the Ottawa Citizen that housing in the country had risen over 25 years by 11 percent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/comment-page-1/#comment-30253</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/#comment-30253</guid>
		<description>You guys are right, stupid me for trusting a newspapers numbers. I will revisit this post with the proper numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are right, stupid me for trusting a newspapers numbers. I will revisit this post with the proper numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/comment-page-1/#comment-30251</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/#comment-30251</guid>
		<description>They took an 11% rise in the first year ($8,360) and added that amount 24 times. This is terribly misleading. The actual annual increase in the example they use is under 5.5 percent. Hope this was a mistake and not deliberate. The Ottawa Citizen should check these things before they print them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They took an 11% rise in the first year ($8,360) and added that amount 24 times. This is terribly misleading. The actual annual increase in the example they use is under 5.5 percent. Hope this was a mistake and not deliberate. The Ottawa Citizen should check these things before they print them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buford Twain</title>
		<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/comment-page-1/#comment-28693</link>
		<dc:creator>Buford Twain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/01/24/canadian-real-estate-appreciated-11-a-year-over-long-term/#comment-28693</guid>
		<description>If the housing prices in Canada had gone up 11% annually for 25 years then a $76k house would be worth over $1 million. Their math seems completely wrong.

11 % annually for 25 yrs = (1.11) ^ 25 = 13.6

13.6 * $76k = $1.03 million</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the housing prices in Canada had gone up 11% annually for 25 years then a $76k house would be worth over $1 million. Their math seems completely wrong.</p>
<p>11 % annually for 25 yrs = (1.11) ^ 25 = 13.6</p>
<p>13.6 * $76k = $1.03 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
