Top 10 Markets With Lowest Mortgage Risk, Summer 2007 : The Real Estate Bloggers

Top 10 Markets With Lowest Mortgage Risk, Summer 2007

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

If you are looking to move to a safe and non volitile community where property appreciation is going to be modest and safe, these communities according to the PMI Institute are positioned to be your best bet. They have determined that these communities have the least risk to mortgage failure and foreclosure.

The PMI group underwrites Private Mortgage Insurance and their goal is to have the mortgages written have the least amount of risk in them. They want to maximize their revenue as much as we all do. So their goal is see the regions of the country where mortgage risk is the greatest and the lowest.

Top 10 Markets With Lowest Mortgage Risk, Summer 2007

  1. Pittsburgh, PA (64)
  2. Fort Worth-Arlington, TX (74)
  3. Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX (75)
  4. Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX (79)
  5. Indianapolis-Carmel, IN  (84)
  6. Columbus, OH  (93)
  7. Cincinnati-Middletown,OH-KY-IN (97)
  8. San Antonio, TX (102)
  9. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH (121)
  10. Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC (125)

Full PMI Report and Podcast

Related posts:
  1. Top 10 Markets With Highest Mortgage Risk, Summer 2007
  2. PMI Institute Numbers Are Out and Mortgage Risk is Up
  3. 10 Safest Housing Markets, Fall 2006
  4. Top 10 Stable Real Estate Markets in United States For 2007-2008
  5. Mortgage Demand Slows Down to Lowest Level For 2006



Previous Post: 69 Billion Dollars Raised For Golbal Real Estate Funds This Year | Next Post: Real Estate Weblogging 101 Is Now In Session



 

If you enjoyed this post, we can deliver daily content from the Real Estate Bloggers.

Subscribe using your RSS Reader

Or Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:


There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. […] is on the “Top 10 Markets with Lowest Mortgage Risk Summer 2007″ on the Real Estate Bloggers and the PMI study those lists come […]

Post a Response

« Back to text comment