Comments on: Top 20 Metro Areas Show Huge Appreciations Eroding But Not Plummeting http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/12/31/top-20-metro-areas-show-huge-appreciations-eroding-but-not-plummeting/ Real Estate Blog, Mortgage, and Development News Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:00:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Brian Pate http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/12/31/top-20-metro-areas-show-huge-appreciations-eroding-but-not-plummeting/comment-page-1/#comment-154640 Brian Pate Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:51:21 +0000 http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/12/31/top-20-metro-areas-show-huge-appreciations-eroding-but-not-plummeting/#comment-154640 Do you have the numbers for the Raleigh/Durham market? I would love to see them. Also, what is the formula that arrived at these numbers? I would like more detail. Is the source MLS in the local markets? Do you have the numbers for the Raleigh/Durham market? I would love to see them.

Also, what is the formula that arrived at these numbers? I would like more detail. Is the source MLS in the local markets?

]]> By: Allen http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/12/31/top-20-metro-areas-show-huge-appreciations-eroding-but-not-plummeting/comment-page-1/#comment-135426 Allen Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:43:49 +0000 http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/12/31/top-20-metro-areas-show-huge-appreciations-eroding-but-not-plummeting/#comment-135426 Utah should have salt lake city on the list I heard it was one of the fastest appreciation cities in the Usa. http://www.livelymoney.blogspot.com Utah should have salt lake city on the list I heard it was one of the fastest appreciation cities in the Usa.
http://www.livelymoney.blogspot.com

]]> By: Richard http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/12/31/top-20-metro-areas-show-huge-appreciations-eroding-but-not-plummeting/comment-page-1/#comment-134905 Richard Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:41:00 +0000 http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2007/12/31/top-20-metro-areas-show-huge-appreciations-eroding-but-not-plummeting/#comment-134905 Are these numbers indexed to 2000? - meaning that 2000 value is 100. i.e. a number of 150 is a 50% increase over 2000 not 150% increase. This makes more sense as Dallas values did not go up 124% since 2000 but rather 24%. If this is the case, Detroit is below 2000 values. Are these numbers indexed to 2000? – meaning that 2000 value is 100. i.e. a number of 150 is a 50% increase over 2000 not 150% increase. This makes more sense as Dallas values did not go up 124% since 2000 but rather 24%. If this is the case, Detroit is below 2000 values.

]]>