Megan McArdle, on the Atlantic Magazine blog,  has an excellent analysis of the recent dance between the Federal Reserve, Bear Stearns, and JP Morgan. The averting of a credit crisis that has been projected by the bubble bloggers may be short lived, but overall the Federal Reserve did it’s job in this instance.

Yes, this is creating moral hazard that we’ll have to deal with, probably unpleasantly, down the road. But whatever the moral hazard, it is hard to see how it could be worse than the full-blown financial crisis the Fed is trying to avert.

There’s an argument, of course, that successive Fed interventions, starting with the Russian bond crisis, have turned bankers into ever-greater risk takers, making each crisis bigger and more expensive than the last. The thinking goes that we need to draw the line here, whatever the cost, because if we let the financiers go on their merry way, eventually they’ll create a wave that will swamp the Fed’s power to intervene. Possibly so, but from what I hear, the people on Wall Street are pretty much scared right down to the tips of their Gordon Gekko underoos.

In some sense, right now it’s the Fed’s job to manage that fear–to scare them enough to ratchet back their risk profile, without scaring them so badly that they hunker down inside their weekend house and refuse to buy or sell anything. That’s very tricky, and since in the long run we’ll all be dead, I’d rather the Fed err slightly on the side of cheering them up. Perhaps Helicopter Ben should start pumping anti-depressants into the Wall Street water supply.  via Megan McArdle

Related posts:

1. The Chicago Tea Party
2. Hispanic Road To Distruction in Home Buying Initiatives By Congress And Lenders
3. The Financial Crisis in 3 Panels
4. Peter Wallison On How Government Created The Housing Crisis
5. Why Letting Judges Modify Mortgages Is Bad For All