Connecticut Extends Real Estate Tax in Poor Market

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Government-bloodsuckersWhat a surprise. Connecticut extends it’s  real estate conveyance tax. The tax that adds an additional charge on home sellers has been extended for 2 more years by the state legislature.

As the New Britain mayor states, “In our world, revenues are very difficult to obtain,” . These folks do not see the money as the homeowners or their constituents once it starts rolling in. They see it as theirs to spend. And like any other predatory animal they will fight tooth and nail to keep the revenue stream funding their pet projects.

So when your local or state government tells you a tax will be for a short time, trust us, fight them as hard as they will fight you to renew it. It is your only hope at that stage.

Meanwhile, lawmakers agreed to extend a local tax on real estate transactions for two more years _ a move strongly opposed by real estate agents, but touted by municipal officials who argue they desperately need the revenue. The tax, paid by the home seller, is expected to raise $36 million to $38 million from the slowing real estate market.

“In our world, revenues are very difficult to obtain,” said New Britain Mayor Timothy Stewart, whose city is expecting about $400,000 from the tax. New Britain is facing a budget deficit of about $2.2 million, he said.

But real estate agents claim it’s unfair to impose the tax, which was supposed to be temporary, on sellers in such a poor market. The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities estimates the tax would add $420 to the sale of a $300,000 home.  “If you don’t kill it now, it’s here to stay,” warned Sen. David Cappiello, R-Danbury. “Please keep the promise you made five years ago.” via Newsday.com

Related posts:
  1. BlackRock Still Profitable Even With Poor Commercial Market
  2. Luxury Real Estate Market Still Strong If You Know How To Market To It
  3. Zombie Subdivisions - The Living Dead of the Real Estate Market
  4. Standard & Poor Lower Ratings For Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Bonds
  5. Housing Plan Stuck, National Recovery In Hands of Real Estate Market

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. Somehow the words fiscal discipline and budgetary restraint can’t be pronounced by most politicos.

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • My Representative is one of the infamous eight Republicans who voted to support this disgraceful legislation, Frank LoBiondo in South ...
      Susan | 3Jul09 | More
    • When selling our homes, what takes place should be between the seller and the buyer. Not the government. ...
      sam | 3Jul09 | More
    • Yea I guess I would be mad or should I say disappointed if I missed the cut off date for ...
      Lauren | 3Jul09 | More
    • If you haven't read this bill I could easily see how one could support it. I mean the bill ...
      Corey K | 3Jul09 | More
    • Pain is gain. I really support this, and the change may be hard but it has to be done. ...
      M Realty | 3Jul09 | More
    • I can't tell you how many people I've talked to in the past week who are completely unaware that the ...
      Trish | 3Jul09 | More
    • The liberal government policies have facilitated the expansion of the foreign involvement in the Real Estate Investment sector.
      genetic cancer testing | 3Jul09 | More
    • We all know EPA has the most murders per 100k ever. 175 murders per 100k.
      hmmm | 3Jul09 | More
    • I am confused...I closed on my house 1 April 2008, I did not get $7500 pay back or $8000 no ...
      Jeff Hammack | 2Jul09 | More
    • I am a person that has been qualified for a loan and really would love to see this enacted. ...
      Gretchen | 2Jul09 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Recent Friends Visiting

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner