Reverse Mortgage Benefit Tucked Away In Housing Bill

Senior citizenThe Federal Housing Bill of 2008 has an additional perk for senior citizens borrowing money via a reverse mortgage. The cap on reverse mortgages has been lifted to $625,000 and fees that can be charged by lenders have been restricted.

I wonder if the costs and the risks in these loans will make lenders less willing to make the loans as their income opportunity will be lowered. No one wants to see the unscrupulous take advantage of senior citizens so I am not completely against safeguards.

However, politicians know seniors are one of the most reliable voting blocks out there. So whenever the politicians make laws targeting seniors, expect them to be very one sided. Mortgage companies may have to lower their fees so much now that the loans will be much harder to attain.

Now there will be a higher borrowing level on FHA reverse mortgages — with $625,000 of home value as a cap, and a $417,000 borrowing limit. Fees will be capped at 2% of the first $200,000 borrowed, and 1% on the balance — with an absolute maximum of $6,000 in fees.

These rules apply to FHA mortgages, which insure the lender against the possibility that the homeowners will stick around far longer than anticipated!  via TheStreet.com

Related posts:
  1. FHA Loses 800 Million Dollars on Reverse Mortgages For Seniors
  2. Senior Housing A Strong Point In Market
  3. For Those Who Forget, How We Got Into This Mortgage Mess
  4. Lenders Buried Under Load of Mortgage Re-Works
  5. Mortgage Bankers Association Propose Dismantling of Freddie, Fannie

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. I live in the UK at the moment and am having trouble sorting out. In the UK we do have a system of grants and pension aid towards providing for the elderly (http://www.financingretirement.co.uk/grants-and-funding-for-senior-citizens.html) but there is very little in term of mortgage allowances aim at that age demographic. Do you think the Federal Housing Bill of 2008 and its benefits for the elderly could have a similar but opposite effect for younger people wanting to borrow? You do suggest this in you article can you expand on it please or suggest some other sources where I could find this information out.

    Thanks,
    Jim

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • Well Tom, once again you have said it much better than I could have. Unfortunately the folks at Move, ...
      Joe Spake | 7Nov09 | More
    • It certainly does not bode well for a fast recovery in the economic climate. This will affect all real estate ...
      Antony Lexington@Home loan | 7Nov09 | More
    • I HAVE 25 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS..HOW DO I APPLY AT KAI.
      ROBIN SPURLIN | 6Nov09 | More
    • Definitely not a fan of Move Inc.!!!
      Tony Sena | 6Nov09 | More
    • A lot of you really need to go back to kindergarten and learn to spell correctly. If you cannot spell ...
      SpazzyCat | 6Nov09 | More
    • In 2008, there was an extension to push first-time home buyers to purchase their homes quickly since the program did ...
      Mary | 6Nov09 | More
    • I also need HELP and don't know what to do about my problem. I have a garden apartment off ...
      Cheryl Gungor | 6Nov09 | More
    • I have the same situation. I sold my home in July and am scheduled to to close in a few ...
      Arlo Moehlenoah | 6Nov09 | More
    • My cousin in Maryland going thru same thing as Jack Thomas. Have loan Mod Agreement from Countywide dated April 2009, ...
      Trying to help BoA customer | 6Nov09 | More
    • Print Ads is the popular way to advertise among seniors in the business industry but today it seems like it ...
      Central Oregon Homes | 6Nov09 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Recent Friends Visiting

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner