<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Led Lighting Brightening Up Home Energy Use In Near Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2008/08/25/led-lighting-brightening-up-home-energy-use-in-near-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2008/08/25/led-lighting-brightening-up-home-energy-use-in-near-future/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Blog, Mortgage, and Development News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2008/08/25/led-lighting-brightening-up-home-energy-use-in-near-future/comment-page-1/#comment-250590</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therealestatebloggers.com/2008/08/25/led-lighting-brightening-up-home-energy-use-in-near-future/#comment-250590</guid>
		<description>According to the U.S. Department of Energy, just 8.8% of the electrical consumption of the average home is due to lighting. Lighting is not a big energy hog and is probably not the best place to be focusing on electrical energy reduction.

Changing out incandescents for CFLs makes sense where the lights are used a lot, but not much sense where lights are seldom used (closets, under stairs, utility rooms, some hallways, exterior lights). LED lights make even less sense in those situations. However, Congress will now require use to replace our incandescent bulbs that are virtually never used with more expensive CFLs. Which makes neither sense nor cents except for light bulb manufacturers. There is a place for each technology - but none of them are panaceas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the U.S. Department of Energy, just 8.8% of the electrical consumption of the average home is due to lighting. Lighting is not a big energy hog and is probably not the best place to be focusing on electrical energy reduction.</p>
<p>Changing out incandescents for CFLs makes sense where the lights are used a lot, but not much sense where lights are seldom used (closets, under stairs, utility rooms, some hallways, exterior lights). LED lights make even less sense in those situations. However, Congress will now require use to replace our incandescent bulbs that are virtually never used with more expensive CFLs. Which makes neither sense nor cents except for light bulb manufacturers. There is a place for each technology &#8211; but none of them are panaceas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
