Fed Bailout of Freddie and Fannie For Foreign Investors or American Citizens?
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
The Financial Times has a great article this morning on why the Feds took over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The primary discussion in the real estate blogosphere is the impact on lending and consumers. But the second and long term reason is that confidence by foreign investors has been severely tested.
The soaring debt being created by the United States combined with a rapid deflation of housing and banking assets has spooked investor from overseas. If the flight of capital that has started turns into a rout there could be severe complications for the long term fiscal health of the United States.
The Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae situation was a bellwether moment. With Secretary Paulson’s actions he is signaling that the country will stand behind our financial institutions.
The intervention has a second purpose too: to shore up confidence among foreign investors. Throughout the credit crisis, policymakers have worried about the risk of a flight from US assets that would greatly aggravate the credit crunch, forcing a brutal adjustment in US savings and investment.
Since mid-July foreign central banks reduced their holdings of Fannie and Freddie debt by $18bn (£10.2bn) in a clear sign of a loss of confidence.
As Treasury secretary of a debtor nation, Mr Paulson was determined to keep faith with the world’s investors - honouring the assumptions on which they invested.
However, the ability of the US government to drive down mortgage rates and to reassure foreign investors is constrained by the need not to push up its own borrowing rates by taking on too much debt and mortgage risk. US public finances are already strained.
Of course the financial bailout is also for the US consumers and homebuyers. The Financial Times explains why this also benefits all Americans, both in and out of the housing market.
Assuming the US can drive down mortgage rates, the question is how much of an impact this will have on housing, financial markets and the economy.
Mortgage rates are not the main reason why house prices are falling. Stocks of unsold homes are high, prices are still elevated on some measures, the risk of local foreclosure spirals remains high, and unemployment is rising.
So while lower mortgage rates should improve the base case outlook for housing, they may not radically alter it. Still, the takeover significantly reduces the risk of a total collapse in house prices. This in itself increases the value of housing-related assets and bank stocks, which rallied yesterday.
Mortgage rate cuts could trigger a refinancing boom, putting cash in the hands of consumers and supercharging the effect of past Fed rate cuts.
Moreover, if banks are less afraid of further losses on mortgage-related securities, they should be more willing to extend loans, moderating the credit squeeze. via FT.com
I agree. The flood gates have been opened and it will be some time before they close. The ...
I agree, using an auction is not only smart, it's really the best way to sell in any market. ...
Do people not check into things anymore? Its people like this that give craigslist the bad name... I ...
That's a great idea for getting a great understanding of the optimal price for a piece of Real Estate 
This is the situation for not only CB Richard Ellis but all commercial firms that are in the business of ...
That is too funny! 
A faulty system? The only way a head activates is by heat unless it is tampered with.. Every system is ...
IM in need of a job bad can i stillm apply for a positon at the kia plant ill take ...
This isn't completely accurate because major cities have good and bad suburbs. The suburbs are part of the major city, ...
Comment by Brad G on 13 September 2008:
I wish Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would go away. Government does not need to be bailing anybody out anymore. They need to let businesses fail.
Comment by Leonard Pearson on 18 September 2008:
We stand behind them, but this is what they do to some of us. I bought my house, put 20% down, and didn’t pull the equity out and buy toys. But when I suffered an injury and had to have two surgeries, I asked my bank to defer some payments to the back end of the loan, because my short term disability wasn’t enough to cover all my bills. They told me no, they wouldn’t help me. At this point the market had dropped so much that my $50,000 down payment, and the $15,000 buffer, the amount under the appraised value that I purchased my house for, were gone. Why would they assist me when they can be bailed out, and re-sell the property after they kick me out. Why make things easy for someone who bought the home in the traditional fashion, and only wants to pay it off in the traditional manner.
It seems, the only easy part is buying a house when you should never qualify for it, or being the bank that practices bad lending techniques, and waiting for Uncle Sam to bail you out.
I’ve lost my equity, my temper, and my patience, now I’m about to lose my home because there is nobody telling the banks that they need to do all they can to FIX the problem, there’s just the welfare line for them that seems to work like other welfare lines, taking care of those that refuse to take care of themselves.
It’s funny, if I knew that I would still end up paying for a house I don’t own, I would have bought a bigger one with a pool.
Comment by brabra on 8 October 2008:
With websites like http://www.fakepaycheckstub.com ( a program that creates fake paycheck stubs ) where people can falsify income and use this info to get a loan, i wouldnt take any banks word at being AAA they are all junk because i know EVERY bank has had at least one fraudelent deal go through their books!
Pingback by Matt Mason : Fed Bailout of Freddie and Fannie on 14 October 2008:
[...] Fed Bailout of Freddie and Fannie For Foreign Investors or American Citizens?September 10th, 2008 • [...]