Should The $8,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Go Away

MoneyhousesmallIf you listen to the real estate community, the $8,000 tax credit is necessary for getting the market though a tough patch and one of the more successful programs of the Federal Government. But Martha White of The Big Money has a contrarian point of view. She thinks we should kill the tax credit.

That’s not the only problem. The credit also artificially inflates the value of eligible homes sold by up to $8,000, leaving the buyer with a debt that’s greater than the value of the property. Sound familiar? Inflated home values were a big part of what got us into this mess in the first place. Perpetuating this via the tax credit might lessen the pain in the near term, but as we’ve all learned the hard way, a correction’s going to come sooner or later.

What’s more, the credit creates skewed incentives. America’s tax code is tilted heavily in favor of home ownership; if you own your house, you get to deduct the interest you pay on your mortgage as well as the property taxes. Plus, the more house you own, the more you can deduct. Some economists think this encourages buyers to stretch for a McMansion instead of buying a more modest abode; following this logic, dropping the income cap and first-time requirement on the tax credit would only increase that effect. via the Washington Post.

The reality is that Washington hates getting rid of things that make them popular. And this tax credit is popular with both the population at large and special interest groups. While I do not expect it to be kept forever, it would surprise me greatly if it is not kept alive for a couple of more years.

Related posts:
  1. $8,000 New Home Buyer Tax Credit, $6,500 Old Home Buyer Tax Credit
  2. IRS Auditing 100,000 Home-Buyer Credit Recipients
  3. Will Washington Extend the $8,000 Tax Credit
  4. New Home Sales Down Even With First Time Homebuyers Credit
  5. The Other Side – Fraud in New Home Buyers Tax Credit

« « Strategic Mortgage Defaults Rising in Hard Hit Regions| Could Your Real Estate Blog Be In Trouble With The FTC? » »

There Are 9 Responses So Far. »

  1. Hi, I really appreciate such kind of useful information regarding TAX credit. Thanks for your info.

    Smith John

  2. The tax credit does have its pros and cons so its hard to say if its really necessary or not. I don’t know about a couple more years, but it will most likely be extended.

  3. It was necessary to give things a boost. Most of the kickstarts that our market gets are all unsustainable ones that artificially modify the market en masse. Whether the Dems or Reps are in control, it all amounts to the same thing.

    -Tyler

  4. The Tax Credit must stop now. let the market correct itself.Might not be a popular opinion coming from a Real Estate Managing Principle Broker.

  5. You didn’t show the part of the article that shows each incremental sale cost $43,500 in debt to our children using the NAR numbers and $100,000 using the NAHB numbers. The tax credit should be an embarrassment to the NAR, the public and the government.

  6. The tax credit was needed to give the market a boost. Where else was it going to come from? Lenders that got us into such a mess in the first place? I doubt it. Lending practices need to change, and unfornuately there are still too many people that are losing their homes every month. That is the embarrassment of this nation, and it’s just shameful. Good discussion. I’m sure there are pros and cons galore on this issue.

  7. [...] and one of the more successful programs of the Federal Government. But Martha White of The Big Money has a contrarian point of view. She thinks we should kill the tax [...]

  8. Does first time home buyer still gets the $8000 tax credit?

  9. [...] some can argue that the tax credit is artificially boosting property values in most areas, your unique scenario and home buying goals should be the determining factor as to [...]

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • My wife has actually decided to study for and get her real eatate licence just so we dont ever have ...
      Brandon | 20Mar10 | More
    • I like your analogy in this article. The real estate economy really is like a patient who you cannot ...
      Bill Hernandez | 19Mar10 | More
    • Real Estate is hyper-local. Every market is different. Phoenix has already hit bottom and is starting to recover. We have ...
      Marc Brodeur | 19Mar10 | More
    • Great to hear that the big boys are predicting recovery sooner than most think. Thanks for the value!
      Mark Arenella | 19Mar10 | More
    • I agree--good analogy. You have to crawl before you can walk. Right now, at least in Austin, many people would ...
      Austin Mortgage | 19Mar10 | More
    • an add on to my previous comment--I suppose nationally it's hard to tell, but each city and market is in ...
      Austin Mortgage | 19Mar10 | More
    • Hmm.....interesting. Of course, I would love to see the real estate market bounce back as quickly as possible, but just ...
      Austin Mortgage | 19Mar10 | More
    • I live in the Philippines and I am glad we are not on the lists...
      homes for sale in chandler az | 19Mar10 | More
    • I have a few Litograghs of Presidents homes , made by Richard V. Sebring. yr. 1990 Do they have any ...
      Jack | 18Mar10 | More
    • I see the question I have, but no response. I do not have a for sale sign up ...
      Judi | 18Mar10 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner