The Peter Cooper – Stuyvesant Town Blunder Soon To Be A Bankruptcy?

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Petercooper

Peter Cooper – Stuyvesant Town sets record deal at 5.4 billion dollars read the headlines. One of the biggest real estate deals ever and the new owners were going to use their acute business acumen to turn the community from a rent control paradise to a high rent district.

The boys at Tishman Speyer Properties are geniuses I tell you, geniuses!

As a true New Yorker would say, Getoutahere!

The hubris and moxie that pushed through this deal and sucked in pension funds such as Calpers and the Church of England is about to go belly up unless the rabbit can be put into the hat.

The sprawling Manhattan apartment complex known as Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town — acquired for $5.4 billion in 2006 by a venture of Tishman Speyer Properties and a unit of BlackRockInc. — is running out of cash. As of the end of September, it had $33.7 million left of the $400 million in interest reserves set up to service its debt, according to the people familiar with the matter. At its current burn rate of about $16 million per month, the reserve could be depleted before the end of the year, the people said. Others have said the venture could avoid default until February.

There are only 2 groups that are happy as this incident runs to a conclusion. MetLife is got to be thrilled that they sold the units at the top of the market and got a premium for their share holders and policy holders.

Oh, and the other group? That is the long term rent controlled stabilized tenants who have fought off Tishman Speyer’s attempt to break through. That is as tough a bunch as I have ever come across and I should have known that no company could ever fight them and come away unscathed.

(The author spent a year living in a rent controlled apartment in Peter Cooper in the late 80’s so he knows the tenacity and passion the tenants have about their rent control.)(Thanks for the correction, the apartments are not rent controlled, they are rent stabilized!)

Related posts:
  1. Stuyvesant Town And Peter Cooper Village Poster Child of Easy Credit Excess
  2. Calpers May Fire BlackRock as an Advisor After StuyTown Debacle
  3. CalPERS Looking For Real Estate Advisors
  4. Fairfield Residential Files For Bankruptcy
  5. Two Thirds of Landlords Will Lower Rent For Struggling Tenants

« « Some Interesting Real Estate Employment Statistics| Want To Live Like Tom Brady? 10.9 Million Will Get You His Boston Penthouse » »

There Are 6 Responses So Far. »

  1. The apartments in Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village are NOT rent controlled. They are rent stabilized.

  2. PCV/ST is not rent controlled and never was. There is a big difference in rent stabilization and rent control. Tishman is trying to take advantage of luxury decontrol–whose guidelines haven’t changed with inflation–and the lovely major capital improvement loophole.

  3. [...] The hubris and moxie that pushed through this deal and sucked in pension fundsSource: The Real Estate Bloggers RSS Feed [...]

  4. Thanks Frances and Lee Ann for the correction. The post has been updated to reflect the changes.

  5. You neglected to mention that landlords of rent-stabilized buildings ALWAYS are allowed to increase rents, regardless of whether their costs have gone up or down. And although rent-stabilized tenants have fought the unbridled greed of various landlords in ST/PCV, they have not always prevailed. Management has been so inept and illegal that market-rate tenants have joined the battle. And why not mention the importance of affordable housing in Manhattan and how Bloomberg has eviscerated the middle class? Before MetLife sold the property they had nurtured so carefully, people were willing to wait years to get in.

  6. Irregardless of his philanthropy and civic contributions, Jerry Speyer’s legacy will be his failed, greed-fueled attempt to jack boot thousands of longstanding, middle class, NYC citizens out of their Stuyvesant Town residences. Many of his victims included elderly WWII veterans and/or their wives/widows – the very same people for whom the complex was built.

Post a Response

« Back to text comment
  • Popular

    Most Comments

    Search

    Tags

    Archives

  • Recent Comments

    • Very funny comparison. However you don't need to pay property tax on Barbies 3 Story Dream House. With the unemployment ...
      Pete | 21Mar10 | More
    • My wife has actually decided to study for and get her real eatate licence just so we dont ever have ...
      Brandon | 20Mar10 | More
    • I like your analogy in this article. The real estate economy really is like a patient who you cannot ...
      Bill Hernandez | 19Mar10 | More
    • Real Estate is hyper-local. Every market is different. Phoenix has already hit bottom and is starting to recover. We have ...
      Marc Brodeur | 19Mar10 | More
    • Great to hear that the big boys are predicting recovery sooner than most think. Thanks for the value!
      Mark Arenella | 19Mar10 | More
    • I agree--good analogy. You have to crawl before you can walk. Right now, at least in Austin, many people would ...
      Austin Mortgage | 19Mar10 | More
    • an add on to my previous comment--I suppose nationally it's hard to tell, but each city and market is in ...
      Austin Mortgage | 19Mar10 | More
    • Hmm.....interesting. Of course, I would love to see the real estate market bounce back as quickly as possible, but just ...
      Austin Mortgage | 19Mar10 | More
    • I live in the Philippines and I am glad we are not on the lists...
      homes for sale in chandler az | 19Mar10 | More
    • I have a few Litograghs of Presidents homes , made by Richard V. Sebring. yr. 1990 Do they have any ...
      Jack | 18Mar10 | More
  • Statistics

  • Friends

  • Subscribe





    Get Updates Delivered Daily By E-Mail:

    Delivered by FeedBurner