IRS Takes Close Look At Real Estate Professionals

by Tom Royce on July 21, 2008


IRS-real-estateAre you a real estate professional? If you have a W-2 job elsewhere the IRS does not think so. The difference in income (and loss) classifications between passive losses and material participating losses can be huge for the bottom line.

And it looks like the IRS has set their sites on these investors. According to Diane Kennedy’s article at the Realty Times, audits on real estate professionals are rising as the IRS is enforcing this distinction.

To meet the IRS requirements, you need two things: spend the majority of your working time spent performing qualified real estate activities (regardless of what you do), and rack up at least 750 hours. Qualified activities include “develop, redevelop, construct, reconstruct, acquire, convert, rent, operate, manage, lease or sell” real estate.

Practically speaking you won’t make the cut if you work elsewhere and report full-time W-2 income. And there’s a third hurdle: material participation. In a twist that can only make sense in the IRS world, real estate activities are one of two things: passive, or materially participating passive. If you have a passive loss, it can only be used against passive income. Period.

Read the rest of Diane’s article at Realty Times

Related Posts with Thumbnails

No related posts.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Surveillance Bill July 26, 2008 at 5:19 am

Your most effective marketing tool may be your own customer list, but you’d better make sure you have one. A lot of people think they can just use the list of companies they send bills to. Wrong. That’s a billing list. If you want a marketing list, you have to generate one, and that means including the information a marketer needs, which is a lot different from the information a credit manager needs.ErnanRomanErnan Roman, author of Integrated Direct Marketing: Techniques and Strategies for Success

Reply

9/11 July 27, 2008 at 10:08 am

An original writer is not one who imitates nobody, but one whom nobody can imitate.Fran%E7ois-Ren%E9deChateaubriandFran?ois-Ren? de Chateaubriand

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: